Comparison of Circadian Variation for In-Hospital Versus Out-of-Hospital Sudden Cardiac Arrest Survivors.

Several studies have reported circadian periodicity of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). It remains unclear to what extent this circadian rhythm is influenced by variation in patients' activities. One way to elucidate this is to compare patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) with those with in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCAs). We therefore examined the presence of a circadian pattern of SCA in a large cohort of OHCA and IHCA survivors. A total of 1,433 consecutive survivors of SCA in the Pittsburgh area from 2002 to 2012 were included. Patient demographics, including clinical histories and details of SCA, were collected. The distribution of SCA throughout the day was tested for differences using the chi-square test. Of the 1,224 patients analyzed, 706 had IHCA and 518 OHCA. We observed a nadir of SCA in the nighttime hours between 12 a.m. and 6 a.m. in both IHCA and OHCA groups (p <0.001), although this pattern was more blunted in the IHCA group. Patients who had an SCA in the nighttime window had more co-morbidities (p = 0.01). The circadian pattern was noted to be absent in patients with higher co-morbidity burden in IHCA only. In conclusion, the typical pattern of nighttime nadir in SCA is observed in patients with both OHCA and IHCA but is blunted in the hospital and especially in sicker patients. This suggests a common mechanistic pathway of SCA transcending differences in physical activities of patients and a difference in how co-morbidities interact with the timing of SCA in the inpatient setting.

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy: Predictors of Appropriate Therapy, Outcomes, and Complications.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy is characterized by ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Once the diagnosis is established, risk stratification to determine whether implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement is warranted is critical. METHODS AND RESULTS: The cohort included 312 patients (163 men, age at presentation 33.6±13.9 years) with definite arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy who received an ICD. Over 8.8±7.33 years, 186 participants (60%) had appropriate ICD therapy and 58 (19%) had an intervention for ventricular fibrillation/flutter. Ventricular tachycardia at presentation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-2.49; P<0.001), inducibility on electrophysiology study (HR: 3.14; 95% CI, 1.95-5.05; P<0.001), male sex (HR: 1.62; 95% CI, 1.20-2.19; P=0.001), inverted T waves in ≥3 precordial leads (HR: 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09-2.52; P=0.018), and premature ventricular contraction count ≥1000/24 hours (HR: 2.30; 95% CI, 1.32-4.00; P=0.003) were predictors of any appropriate ICD therapy. Inducibility at electrophysiology study (HR: 2.28; 95% CI, 1.10-4.70; P=0.025) remained as the only predictor after multivariable analysis. The predictors for ventricular fibrillation/flutter were premature ventricular contraction ≥1000/24 hours (HR: 4.39; 95% CI, 1.32-14.61; P=0.016), syncope (HR: 1.85; 95% CI, 1.10-3.11; P=0.021), aged ≤30 years at presentation (HR: 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-3.00; P<0.036), and male sex (HR: 1.73; 95% CI, 1.01-2.97; P=0.046). Younger age at presentation (HR: 3.14; 95% CI, 1.32-7.48; P=0.010) and high premature ventricular contraction burden (HR: 4.43; 95% CI, 1.35-14.57; P<0.014) remained as independent predictors of ventricular fibrillation/flutter. Complications occurred in 66 participants (21%), and 64 (21%) had inappropriate ICD interventions. Overall mortality was low at 2%, and 4% underwent heart transplantation. CONCLUSION: These findings represent an important step in identifying predictors of ICD therapy for potentially fatal ventricular fibrillation/flutter and should be considered when developing a risk stratification model for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy.

Management of ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease.

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are a source of significant morbidity and mortality in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). The advent of the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) has had a positive effect on mortality, but the associated morbidity remains a significant problem. Modern treatment of VA has advanced far beyond medical therapy and includes strategies as simple as intelligent ICD programming and as complex as catheter ablation (CA). In these pages, the spectrum of management strategies will be discussed; from anti-arrhythmic drugs and ICD implantation and programming to CA and autonomic modulation. The focus of this review will be on strategies for secondary prevention of VA in patients with SHD, supported by clinical evidence for their utilization.

Novedades en arritmias y estimulación cardiaca en 2013 / Update on Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing 2013

En este trabajo se comentan críticamente los artículos sobre arritmias y estimulación cardiaca aparecidos en 2013 seleccionados como más relevantes. Se repasan las arritmias, subdivididas en taquiarritmias supraventriculares regulares, fibrilación auricular y arritmias ventriculares, incluido su tratamiento mediante desfibrilador automático implantable. Se revisan las publicaciones referidas a estimulación cardiaca, subdivididas en terapia de resincronización, monitorización a domicilio dispositivos implantables y marcapasos. Finalmente, se trata el síncope (AU)

This report discusses a selection of the most relevant articles on cardiac arrhythmias and pacing published in 2013. The first section discusses arrhythmias, classified as regular paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular arrhythmias, together with their treatment by means of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The next section reviews cardiac pacing, subdivided into resynchronization therapy, remote monitoring of implantable devices, and pacemakers. The final section discusses syncope (AU)

Brain natriuretic peptide for the prediction of sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmias: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: The risk stratification of patients for sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a challenge. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) predicts overall mortality in heart disease but it is unclear how well it predicts SCD. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of studies evaluating the accuracy of BNP to predict SCD and ventricular arrhythmias (VA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases and published bibliographies were systematically searched (1984-2008). We found 14 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Six studies (3543 patients) evaluated BNP to predict SCD in patients without implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) across a wide range of populations. A raised BNP predicted SCD with a relative risk of 3.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.90, 7.14]. Eight studies (1047 patients) evaluated BNP to predict the occurrence of VA in patients with ICDs. A raised BNP predicted the occurrence of VA with a relative risk of 2.54 (95% CI 1.87, 3.44). CONCLUSION: The measurement of BNP has significant value in predicting SCD and VA. However, the benefit of BNP testing in addition to other risk stratification tests is unclear and BNP needs to be evaluated prospectively in combination with other complementary risk stratification tools.